Crossword Clue: Further shorten, maybe
If you're looking for all of the crossword answers for the clue "Further shorten, maybe" then you're in the right place. We found 2 answers for this crossword clue.
If you are stuck trying to answer the crossword clue "Further shorten, maybe", and really can't figure it out, then take a look at the answers below to see if they fit the puzzle you're working on.
Matching Crossword Puzzle Answers for "Further shorten, maybe"
Below is the complete list of answers we found in our database for Further shorten, maybe:
Possibly related crossword clues for "Further shorten, maybe"
Based on the answers listed above, we also found some clues that are possibly similar or related to Further shorten, maybe:
- Amend further
- Blue-pencil again
- Blue-pencil anew
- Change again, as a manuscript
- Change again
- Change further, as text
- Change text again
- Further amend
- Further shorten, maybe
- Check anew
- Fix a paragraph
- Fix the punctuation once more
- Do more cutting in the film room
- Go over again, as text
- Go over again with a blue pencil
- Cut again, as a film
- Cut and splice again
- Cut and splice further
- Cut some more, maybe
- Input additional revisions
- Trim again, say
- Shorten further, perhaps
- Suggest additional revisions
- Polish again, as an article
- Prepare another draft
- Modify anew
- Make a long story even shorter?
- Make a new round of corrections
- Make a second pass through
- Make additional revisions
- Make further corrections to a manuscript
- Make further corrections
- Make more changes to
- Make more copy changes
- Make more corrections
- Revise again
- Revise further
- Take back for polishing
Recent Usage of Further shorten, maybe in Crossword Puzzles
We track a lot of different crossword puzzle providers to see where clues like "Further shorten, maybe" have been used in the past.
Here are all of the places we know of that have used Further shorten, maybe in their crossword puzzles recently:
- LA Times - June 14, 2009
- New York Times - Oct. 22, 2006
- New York Times - Feb. 27, 2002